Calls to redraw Eastbourne/Wealden boundary not supported

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
A parish council’s request to redraw the boundary between Eastbourne and Wealden has failed to win the support of higher tier authorities.

On Wednesday (September 20), Wealden District Council’s audit and governance committee confirmed that the authority would not support a request from Willingdon and Jevington Parish Council to hold a Principal Area Boundary Review (PABR).

Through this process, the parish council was requesting that the boundaries between Wealden District Council and Eastbourne Borough Council be redrawn — adding more land to Wealden.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The parish council argued this change could create a more defined boundary between the two authorities.

Eastbourne signs (Photo by Jon Rigby)Eastbourne signs (Photo by Jon Rigby)
Eastbourne signs (Photo by Jon Rigby)

Any such decision would be a matter for The Local Government Boundary Commission For England (LGBCE). However, the committee heard, the organisation is unlikely to proceed with a review without the support of all councils involved.

Officers said a consultation exercise had shown most residents were ‘ambivalent’ about the parish council’s proposal and that evidence of the benefits were also ‘insufficient’.

It was noted that Eastbourne Borough Council had also raised objections.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In comments included within meeting papers, an EBC spokesman said: “It is not considered that this would be in the best interest of the local communities affected and would cause significant complications for both the administration and smooth running of Parliamentary elections and would lead to voter confusion.

“Furthermore, we wish it to be noted that the councillors have never received any suggestions or comments from residents in the above-mentioned areas, wishing to be part of Willingdon and Jevington.”

Wealden officers supported EBC’s views, recommending that the PABR request not be supported. This view was ultimately shared by committee members.

Related topics: